illness: be more prevalent than ever

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.66
, trauma
Weight: 0.63
, infection
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, crisis
Weight: 0.61
Siblings gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.79
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.77
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.75
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.74
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more prevalent than ever 1.00
is prevalent 0.87
become more common 0.81
be prevalent in northeast 0.77
be more common in winter 0.77
feel hotter than normal poop 0.76
be much worse at night 0.75
be more likely in presence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, is prevalent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(lyme disease, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, is prevalent)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(illness, be more prevalent than ever)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(illness, be much worse at night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(illness, become more common)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more common in winter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(illness, become more common)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(illness, become more common)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(illness, become more common)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(illness, be much worse at night)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(illness, be more common in winter)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(illness, be much worse at night)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(illness, be much worse at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(illness, be more prevalent than ever)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lyme disease, is prevalent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more prevalent than ever)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)