illness: was viewed in 1930s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.66
, trauma
Weight: 0.63
, infection
Weight: 0.62
, situation
Weight: 0.61
, crisis
Weight: 0.61
Siblings gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.79
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.77
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.75
, bronchitis
Weight: 0.74
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
was viewed in 1930s 1.00
be viewed 0.97
be viewed in work environment 0.87
be viewed as positive 0.87
was treated in 1800s 0.78
was treated 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(illness, was viewed in 1930s)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(illness, be viewed in work environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(illness, was treated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(illness, was treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illness, was treated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(illness, was treated in 1800s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(illness, was treated in 1800s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(illness, was treated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(illness, was treated in 1800s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(illness, was treated in 1800s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, was viewed in 1930s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(illness, was viewed in 1930s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(illness, was viewed in 1930s)