illustration: be use

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.62
, part
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings example
Weight: 0.74
, portrait
Weight: 0.65
, picture
Weight: 0.63
, reference
Weight: 0.62
, picture frame
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be use 1.00
be use in advertise 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(picture, be use in advertise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(picture, be use in advertise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(picture, be use in advertise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(illustration, be use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(illustration, be use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(illustration, be use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(illustration, be use)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(picture, be use in advertise)