illustration: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.63 , feature Weight: 0.62 , figure Weight: 0.62 , part Weight: 0.60
Siblings	example Weight: 0.74 , portrait Weight: 0.65 , picture Weight: 0.63 , reference Weight: 0.62 , cross section Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(portrait, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(portrait, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(portrait, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(illustration, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(illustration, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(illustration, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(portrait, has quality bad)