imac: be cheaper than macbook pro

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.64
, desktop
Weight: 0.58
, system
Weight: 0.56
, laptop
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, macintosh
Weight: 0.35
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.34
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than macbook pro 1.00
be cheaper than pro 0.88
be cheaper than macbooks 0.88
be better than pc 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(imac, be cheaper than pro)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(imac, be better than pc)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbooks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(imac, be better than pc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(imac, be better than pc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(imac, be better than pc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(imac, be cheaper than macbook pro)