implant: is placed high

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.69
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.62
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings artificial heart
Weight: 0.68
, contact lens
Weight: 0.65
, screw
Weight: 0.59
, plate
Weight: 0.57
, stent
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
is placed high 1.00
is placed 0.93
be placed under muscle 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(stent, is placed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(stent, is placed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(stent, is placed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(implant, is placed high)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(implant, is placed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(implant, be placed under muscle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(implant, is placed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(implant, be placed under muscle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(implant, be placed under muscle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(implant, is placed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(implant, is placed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(implant, be placed under muscle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(implant, is placed high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(implant, is placed high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(implant, is placed high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(stent, is placed)