implication: be use frequently in logic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, difference
Weight: 0.55
, question
Weight: 0.52
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings irony
Weight: 0.34
, justification
Weight: 0.34
, context
Weight: 0.33
, think
Weight: 0.33
, contradiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be use frequently in logic 1.00
requires logic 0.86
be defined as axiom of human think 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(implication, be use frequently in logic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(justification, requires logic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be defined as axiom of human think) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(implication, be use frequently in logic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(justification, requires logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(justification, requires logic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.05
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(implication, be use frequently in logic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(implication, be use frequently in logic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(justification, requires logic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(implication, be use frequently in logic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(concept, be defined as axiom of human think)