imprinting: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, process
Weight: 0.48
, behavior
Weight: 0.33
, example
Weight: 0.33
, method
Weight: 0.33
Siblings lamination
Weight: 0.30
, meiosis
Weight: 0.30
, characteristic
Weight: 0.30
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.30
, molding
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality benefit 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(imprinting, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(imprinting, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(imprinting, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(imprinting, has quality benefit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(imprinting, has quality benefit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(imprinting, has quality benefit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(imprinting, has quality benefit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(imprinting, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(imprinting, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(imprinting, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)