inclusion: be important in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in india 1.00
be in america 0.82
have in america upside-down 0.82
be in america big 0.81
be expensive in canada 0.81
be important in nigeria 0.80
is xp 0.76
is florida 0.76
use windows xp 0.75
be paid for for europe 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, be paid for for europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(inclusion, be important in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(program, be paid for for europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(program, be paid for for europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in nigeria)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(switch, be expensive in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(incorporation, is florida)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(switch, have in america upside-down)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(program, be paid for for europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be important in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(switch, have in america upside-down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(switch, have in america upside-down)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(switch, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(switch, be expensive in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(integration, be important in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(integration, be important in nigeria)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(incorporation, is florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(incorporation, is florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(inclusion, be important in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(inclusion, be important in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(switch, have in america upside-down)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, be important in nigeria)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(incorporation, is florida)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(switch, be expensive in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(inclusion, be important in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)