income: be on bottom line of profit negative

Property	Similarity
be on bottom line of profit negative	1.00
be on line of profit negative	0.97
be on bottom line of profit	0.97
be on line of profit	0.92
be on bottom line	0.86
be called bottom line	0.84
account difference from profit	0.79
be on line	0.79
is negative	0.79
have effect on overall growth	0.76

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(income, be on line of profit negative)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(income, be on line of profit)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(income, be on line of profit negative)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(income, be on line of profit negative)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(income, be called bottom line)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(income, is negative)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(income, is negative)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(income, be on line of profit)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(income, is negative)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(income, be on line of profit)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(income, be called bottom line)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(income, is negative)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(income, be called bottom line)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(income, be on line of profit negative)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(income, account difference from profit)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(income, account difference from profit)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(income, account difference from profit)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(income, be called bottom line)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(income, be on line of profit)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(income, be on bottom line of profit negative) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(income, account difference from profit)

Parents	tax Weight: 0.64 , determinant Weight: 0.61 , allowance Weight: 0.61 , business activity Weight: 0.61
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.80 , operating expense Weight: 0.70 , unemployment Weight: 0.66 , poverty Weight: 0.62

income: be on bottom line of profit negative

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible