increase: be in minimum wage bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.64
, hike
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rate
Weight: 0.33
, gain
Weight: 0.33
, proportion
Weight: 0.32
, savings
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in minimum wage bad 1.00
be in minimum wage good 0.99
be in minimum wage 0.98
be in wage bad 0.93
be in wage good 0.93
be in wage 0.91
be in minimum good 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hike, be in minimum wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(increase, be in minimum wage bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(hike, be in minimum wage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hike, be in minimum wage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(hike, be in minimum wage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(increase, be in minimum wage bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(increase, be in minimum wage good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(increase, be in minimum wage good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(increase, be in minimum wage bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hike, be in minimum wage)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(increase, be in minimum wage bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hike, be in minimum wage)