index: be used in databases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reference
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
Siblings measure
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.66
, temperature
Weight: 0.62
, index card
Weight: 0.59
, pointer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in databases 1.00
be important in databases 0.97
be created in physical database design 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(index, be used in databases)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, be important in databases)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(index, be created in physical database design)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(index, be important in databases)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(index, be created in physical database design)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(index, be important in databases)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(index, be created in physical database design)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(index, be important in databases)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(index, be created in physical database design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(index, be used in databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(index, be used in databases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(index, be used in databases)