indian: were treated in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents culture
Weight: 0.64
, name
Weight: 0.56
, world
Weight: 0.54
, force
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings australian aborigine
Weight: 0.35
, chinese
Weight: 0.34
, british
Weight: 0.34
, mexican
Weight: 0.34
, asian
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in america 1.00
were important to texas history 0.79
be considered asian 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mexican, were treated in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mexican, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mexican, were treated in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(indian, were treated in america)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(indian, be considered asian)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(indian, be considered asian)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(indian, be considered asian)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(indian, be considered asian)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(indian, were important to texas history)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(indian, were important to texas history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(indian, were important to texas history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(indian, were important to texas history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(indian, were treated in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(indian, were treated in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(indian, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mexican, were treated in america)