indiana: be on eastern time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on eastern time 1.00
is eastern time 0.99
be on time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is eastern time)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be on eastern time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(michigan, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(michigan, is eastern time)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(michigan, is eastern time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(indiana, be on eastern time)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(indiana, is eastern time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is eastern time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(indiana, is eastern time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(indiana, be on time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(indiana, is eastern time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(indiana, be on time)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(indiana, be on time)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(indiana, be on eastern time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(michigan, be on eastern time)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be on eastern time)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(michigan, is eastern time)