indiana: have townships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have townships 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(indiana, have townships)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pennsylvania, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(indiana, have townships)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have townships)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(illinois, have townships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have townships)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have townships)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have townships)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, have townships)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(indiana, have townships)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(pennsylvania, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(indiana, have townships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(michigan, have townships)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ohio, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, have townships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(indiana, have townships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(indiana, have townships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have townships)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, have townships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(michigan, have townships)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, have townships)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have townships)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(indiana, have townships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, have townships)