indigo: was great demand in countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dye
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.62
, herb
Weight: 0.62
, color
Weight: 0.59
, fabric
Weight: 0.53
Siblings violet
Weight: 0.36
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.35
, turquoise
Weight: 0.35
, lavender
Weight: 0.35
, angelica
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great demand in countries 1.00
was in great demand in countries 1.00
was in demand in countries 0.96
was in great demand 0.94
was in great demand in european countries 0.92
was great demand in european countries 0.91
was in demand 0.88
was in demand in european countries 0.87
was in great demand in counties 0.83
was in great demand in european counties 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in great demand in countries)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in great demand in countries)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(indigo, was in great demand in countries)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indigo, was great demand in european countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(indigo, was great demand in european countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in great demand in european countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in european countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(indigo, was in great demand in european countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in great demand in european countries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in demand in european countries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in demand in european countries)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(indigo, was in demand in european countries)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in demand in countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(indigo, was in demand in countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in demand in countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indigo, was great demand in european countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in great demand in counties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in great demand in european counties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(indigo, was in great demand in european countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in great demand in european counties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(indigo, was in great demand in european counties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in great demand in counties)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(indigo, was in great demand in countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(indigo, was in great demand in counties)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in great demand)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(indigo, was in demand in european countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(indigo, was in great demand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(indigo, was in great demand in european counties)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indigo, was in great demand in counties)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(indigo, was in demand in countries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in great demand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was in demand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(indigo, was in great demand)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(indigo, was in demand)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(indigo, was in demand)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(indigo, was in demand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indigo, was great demand in countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indigo, was great demand in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indigo, was great demand in countries)