individual: be with down syndrome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, donor
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
, other person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.64
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, academic
Weight: 0.62
, young person
Weight: 0.62
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with down syndrome 1.00
be with asperger syndrome 0.93
be with klinefelter syndrome sterile 0.84
be with turner syndrome sterile 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(individual, be with down syndrome)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(individual, be with asperger syndrome)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(individual, be with asperger syndrome)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(individual, be with klinefelter syndrome sterile)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(individual, be with turner syndrome sterile)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(individual, be with asperger syndrome)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(individual, be with klinefelter syndrome sterile)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(individual, be with turner syndrome sterile)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(individual, be with asperger syndrome)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(individual, be with klinefelter syndrome sterile)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(individual, be with turner syndrome sterile)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(individual, be with klinefelter syndrome sterile)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(individual, be with turner syndrome sterile)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(individual, be with down syndrome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(individual, be with down syndrome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(individual, be with down syndrome)