individual: influence government

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, donor
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
, other person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.64
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, academic
Weight: 0.62
, young person
Weight: 0.62
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence government 1.00
influence national government 0.95
influence economy 0.89
influence policy 0.87
influence public policy 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(individual, influence government)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(individual, influence national government)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(individual, influence national government)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(individual, influence public policy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(individual, influence public policy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(individual, influence national government)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(individual, influence public policy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(individual, influence public policy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(individual, influence public policy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(individual, influence public policy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(individual, influence national government)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(individual, influence public policy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(individual, influence public policy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(individual, influence government)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(individual, influence government)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(individual, influence government)