induction: be done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done 1.00
is done 0.99
be done at night 0.88
happen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, happen)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(combustion, happen)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, happen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(diffusion, happen)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(diffusion, happen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(combustion, happen)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(combustion, happen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hydrolysis, happen)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, happen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(induction, be done)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(induction, is done)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(induction, is done)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done at night)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(induction, is done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(induction, is done)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(induction, happen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, happen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(induction, happen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(induction, happen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(induction, be done at night)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(induction, be done at night)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(induction, be done at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(induction, be done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diffusion, happen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(combustion, happen)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(induction, be done)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, happen)