induction: be important for practitioners individuals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.63
, process
Weight: 0.61
, honor
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.53
, heating element
Weight: 0.53
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.31
, diffusion
Weight: 0.31
, recognition
Weight: 0.31
, award
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for practitioners individuals 1.00
be important for practitioners 0.96
have impact on individuals 0.79
be important in groups 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be important in groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(method, have impact on individuals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(process, be important in groups)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in groups)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, have impact on individuals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be important in groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(method, have impact on individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(induction, be important for practitioners)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(induction, be important for practitioners)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(process, be important in groups)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(method, have impact on individuals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(induction, be important for practitioners individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(process, be important in groups)