indulgence: has quality wrong

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.56 , practice Weight: 0.56 , issue Weight: 0.51 , excess Weight: 0.51 , teaching Weight: 0.51
Siblings	fried egg Weight: 0.59 , relaxation Weight: 0.32 , gluttony Weight: 0.32 , lust Weight: 0.32 , folly Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality wrong	1.00
has quality good	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(teaching, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(teaching, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(teaching, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(lust, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(lust, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(teaching, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(lust, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(lust, has quality wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(lust, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(lust, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(fried egg, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(fried egg, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(indulgence, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(indulgence, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(indulgence, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(teaching, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(lust, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(lust, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(fried egg, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(teaching, has quality good)