industry: affect birth rates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect birth rates 1.00
use rate maximise 0.81
calculate interest rates 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(institution, calculate interest rates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(industry, affect birth rates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(institution, calculate interest rates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(institution, calculate interest rates)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(institution, calculate interest rates)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(industry, affect birth rates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(industry, affect birth rates)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(industry, use rate maximise)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(industry, use rate maximise)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(industry, use rate maximise)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(industry, use rate maximise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect birth rates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(industry, affect birth rates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(institution, calculate interest rates)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(industry, affect birth rates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(institution, calculate interest rates)