industry: be developed in new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be developed in new zealand 1.00
be developed in zealand 0.98
is new england 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sector, is new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sector, is new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sector, is new england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(industry, be developed in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)