industry: be regulated prevent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regulated prevent 1.00
is regulated 0.91
need regulated 0.90
is heavily regulated 0.83
help preventing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(institution, need regulated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(institution, is heavily regulated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(institution, is regulated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(institution, help preventing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(institution, is regulated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(institution, need regulated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(institution, help preventing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(institution, is heavily regulated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(institution, need regulated)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(institution, is regulated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(institution, is heavily regulated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(institution, help preventing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(banking industry, is regulated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(institution, need regulated)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(institution, is regulated)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(institution, is heavily regulated)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(institution, help preventing)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(banking industry, is regulated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(banking industry, is regulated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(industry, be regulated prevent)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, is regulated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, is regulated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(industry, is regulated)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, is regulated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(institution, is regulated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(institution, need regulated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(institution, is heavily regulated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(institution, help preventing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(banking industry, is regulated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(institution, is regulated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(institution, need regulated)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(institution, is heavily regulated)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(industry, be regulated prevent)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(institution, help preventing)