industry: be second leading cause in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be second leading cause in city 1.00
be second leading cause of pollution 0.90
be second leading cause in mexico city 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(industry, be second leading cause in city)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(industry, be second leading cause of pollution)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(industry, be second leading cause in mexico city)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(industry, be second leading cause of pollution)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(industry, be second leading cause in mexico city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(industry, be second leading cause of pollution)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(industry, be second leading cause in mexico city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(industry, be second leading cause in mexico city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(industry, be second leading cause of pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, be second leading cause in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(industry, be second leading cause in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(industry, be second leading cause in city)