industry: need good transportation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sector
Weight: 0.70
, publication
Weight: 0.62
, ministry
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.58
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.83
, banking industry
Weight: 0.80
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.72
, aviation
Weight: 0.70
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
need good transportation 1.00
need transportation 0.98
be located near transportation routes 0.81
need water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(industry, need good transportation)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(industry, need transportation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(industry, need transportation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(industry, need transportation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(industry, need transportation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(industry, be located near transportation routes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(industry, be located near transportation routes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(industry, need water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(industry, be located near transportation routes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(industry, be located near transportation routes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(industry, need water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(industry, need water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(industry, need water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(industry, need good transportation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(industry, need good transportation)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(industry, need good transportation)