infection: be with worms diagnosed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents etiology
Weight: 0.65
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.65
, disease
Weight: 0.65
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.81
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.77
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.77
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.76
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with worms diagnosed 1.00
be with worms treated 0.88
be diagnosed 0.88
be diagnosed as cause 0.86
be with worms treated by doctors 0.86
be with worms 0.85
be with worms treated in medicine 0.83
choke diagnosed 0.83
be diagnosed as cause of rupture 0.80
be diagnosed as cause of rupture of membranes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(infective endocarditis, be diagnosed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(infective endocarditis, be diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(infective endocarditis, be diagnosed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(infection, be with worms diagnosed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(infection, be diagnosed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(infection, be diagnosed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(infection, be diagnosed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(infection, choke diagnosed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms treated by doctors)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(infective endocarditis, be diagnosed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(infection, be with worms diagnosed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)