inflammation: has state injury

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state injury 1.00
is bad injury 0.94
occur after injury 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(inflammation, has state injury)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inflammation, is bad injury)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inflammation, occur after injury)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is bad injury)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inflammation, occur after injury)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(inflammation, occur after injury)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is bad injury)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, occur after injury)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inflammation, is bad injury)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state injury)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflammation, has state injury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state injury)