inflation: be related in short run

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related in short run 1.00
do short term 0.85
be related 0.79
do term 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rate, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be related in short run)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be related in short run)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(interest rate, do short term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be related in short run)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(interest rate, do short term)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(variable, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rate, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, do short term)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rate, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variable, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rate, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inflation, be related in short run)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inflation, be related in short run)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(interest rate, do short term) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inflation, be related in short run)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(inflation, be related in short run)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inflation, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(inflation, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(inflation, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inflation, be related in short run)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(interest rate, do short term)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rate, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(interest rate, do short term)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(inflation, be related in short run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rate, be related)