inflation: hurt creditor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt creditor 1.00
affects creditors 0.88
help debtors 0.81
affects debtors 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(inflation, hurt creditor)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(inflation, affects creditors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(inflation, affects creditors)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(inflation, affects debtors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(inflation, affects debtors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(inflation, affects debtors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(inflation, affects creditors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(inflation, affects creditors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inflation, help debtors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflation, help debtors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(inflation, help debtors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(inflation, help debtors)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(inflation, affects debtors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inflation, hurt creditor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(inflation, hurt creditor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(inflation, hurt creditor)