inflation: reduce buying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
reduce buying 1.00
buying power 0.84
reduce growth 0.81
purchasing power 0.79
increase money supply 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(inequality, reduce growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(inequality, reduce growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, reduce growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inflation, reduce buying)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(inflation, buying power)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(inflation, buying power)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(inflation, buying power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(inflation, purchasing power)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(inflation, purchasing power)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(inflation, purchasing power)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(inflation, buying power)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inflation, purchasing power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inflation, reduce buying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, reduce buying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inflation, reduce buying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(inequality, reduce growth)