influence: be strong in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, drug
Weight: 0.57
Siblings relationship
Weight: 0.61
, folk music
Weight: 0.60
, background
Weight: 0.60
, progressive rock
Weight: 0.59
, moisture
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be strong in africa 1.00
was in southeast asia stronger 0.77
was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(influence, be strong in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(influence, be strong in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(influence, be strong in africa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(influence, be strong in africa)