influenza: have season

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.76
, pathogen
Weight: 0.68
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings flu
Weight: 0.39
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.39
, smallpox
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have season 1.00
be bad year 0.76
come in winter 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(flu, have season)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(flu, be bad year)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(flu, come in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(flu, have season)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(flu, have season)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(flu, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(flu, be bad year)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(flu, come in winter)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(flu, come in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(influenza, have season)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(influenza, be bad year)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be bad year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(influenza, be bad year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(influenza, come in winter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(influenza, come in winter)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(influenza, have season)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(flu, have season)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(flu, be bad year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, have season)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(flu, come in winter)