information: be stored in databases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, explanation
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.60
Siblings historical site
Weight: 0.70
, computer database
Weight: 0.67
, remote control
Weight: 0.65
, military intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stored in databases 1.00
be stored in files 0.88
be stored online 0.87
be stored in computer 0.87
be stored 0.86
be stored electronicly 0.86
be stored on computers 0.86
get stored 0.85
was first stored in computers 0.84
be stored in dna 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(information, be stored in databases)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(information, be stored in computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored in computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(information, be stored in computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(information, be stored)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(information, be stored in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(information, was first stored in computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(information, was first stored in computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(information, be stored)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(information, was first stored in computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(information, was first stored in computers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(information, be stored electronicly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(information, be stored)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(information, be stored online)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(information, be stored electronicly)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(information, be stored electronicly)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(information, be stored online)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored electronicly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(information, be stored online)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored online)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(information, be stored in databases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(information, be stored in databases)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(information, be stored in databases)