inheritance: be essential to process

Related concepts

Parents	unearned income Weight: 0.62 , tax Weight: 0.59 , mechanism Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.57 , matter Weight: 0.57
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.34 , estate Weight: 0.33 , infidelity Weight: 0.31 , retirement Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be essential to process	1.00
be essential to evolutionary process	0.87
is necessary	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(tax, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to process)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to process)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(mechanism, is necessary)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(tax, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(mechanism, is necessary)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(tax, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(income tax, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(tax, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(income tax, is necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(income tax, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(inheritance, be essential to process)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to evolutionary process)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, is necessary)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(inheritance, is necessary)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(inheritance, is necessary)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(inheritance, be essential to evolutionary process)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to evolutionary process)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(inheritance, is necessary)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(inheritance, be essential to evolutionary process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(inheritance, be essential to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(tax, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(income tax, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(inheritance, be essential to process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(tax, is necessary)