inheritance: is classes fragile

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents unearned income
Weight: 0.62
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, mechanism
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, matter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.34
, estate
Weight: 0.33
, infidelity
Weight: 0.31
, retirement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is classes fragile 1.00
is super classes fragile 0.96
has quality classes 0.82
is super classes 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(inheritance, is classes fragile)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(inheritance, is super classes fragile)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(inheritance, is super classes fragile)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, is super classes fragile)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(inheritance, has quality classes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inheritance, is super classes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inheritance, has quality classes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(inheritance, is super classes fragile)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inheritance, is super classes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality classes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, is super classes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(inheritance, has quality classes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inheritance, is super classes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, is classes fragile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(inheritance, is classes fragile)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inheritance, is classes fragile)