inheritance: planning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents unearned income
Weight: 0.62
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, mechanism
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, matter
Weight: 0.57
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.34
, estate
Weight: 0.33
, infidelity
Weight: 0.31
, retirement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
planning 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(estate, planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(estate, planning)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(estate, planning)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inheritance, planning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(inheritance, planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inheritance, planning)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(estate, planning)