ink: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents composition
Weight: 0.59
, paint
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ascorbic acid
Weight: 0.33
, dye
Weight: 0.33
, phosphoric acid
Weight: 0.33
, paper
Weight: 0.33
, wax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was invented 0.81
be created 0.78
was discovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(paint, was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ink, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(paint, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paint, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(phosphoric acid, was discovered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dye, was discovered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dye, was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(paper, was discovered)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(paint, was invented)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ink, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dye, was invented)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dye, was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(paper, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(paper, was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dye, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dye, was discovered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(paper, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(paper, was discovered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(phosphoric acid, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(phosphoric acid, was discovered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ink, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ink, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ink, be created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ink, was invented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ink, was discovered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(ink, be created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ink, be created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ink, was discovered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ink, be created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ink, was discovered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ink, was discovered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ink, was invented)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ink, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ink, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(paint, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dye, was discovered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dye, was invented)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(paper, was discovered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(phosphoric acid, was discovered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(paper, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ink, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(paint, was invented)