institute: austin

Property	Similarity
austin	1.00
dallas	0.84
atlanta	0.83
tucson	0.81
is nyc	0.81
denver	0.81
is chicago	0.80
is nj	0.78
work on usa	0.78
be regarded in london ontario	0.78

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(institute, dallas)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(institute, atlanta)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(institute, denver)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(institute, tucson)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(institute, atlanta)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(institute, atlanta)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(institute, denver)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(institute, is nyc)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(institute, is nj)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(institute, is chicago)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(institute, denver)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(institute, atlanta)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(institute, dallas)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(institute, denver)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(institute, is chicago)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(institute, is chicago)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(institute, is nj)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(institute, is chicago)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(institute, is nj)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(institute, is nj)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(institute, dallas)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(institute, tucson)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(institute, dallas)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(institute, is nyc)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(institute, tucson)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(institute, is nyc)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(institute, is nyc)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(institute, austin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(institute, tucson)

Parents	institution Weight: 0.69 , university Weight: 0.68 , organization Weight: 0.66 , center Weight: 0.62
Siblings	academy Weight: 0.35 , financial institution Weight: 0.35 , educational system Weight: 0.35 , graduate student Weight: 0.34 , association Weight: 0.33

institute: austin

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

Remarkability from parent implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

Typicality inheritance from parent to child