instrument: be better making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents percussion instrument
Weight: 0.73
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.72
, artifact
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.65
Siblings negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.83
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.80
, bass guitar
Weight: 0.75
, bass clarinet
Weight: 0.74
, organ
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better making 1.00
be made 0.83
is made 0.81
has quality better 0.81
were made 0.76
be made sound 0.76
make up system 0.76
make sound 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(brass instrument, be made)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(brass instrument, be made sound)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(artifact, be made)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(artifact, were made)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(brass instrument, make sound)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(artifact, be made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, be made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, make sound)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(artifact, were made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, be made sound)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, be made)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(artifact, were made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, be made sound)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, make sound)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(organ, make up system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(brass instrument, be made)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(artifact, be made)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(brass instrument, be made sound)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(artifact, were made)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(brass instrument, make sound)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(organ, make up system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(organ, make up system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(instrument, be better making)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(instrument, make sound)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(instrument, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(instrument, make sound)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(instrument, be made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(instrument, be made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(instrument, make sound)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be made)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(instrument, make sound)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(artifact, be made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brass instrument, make sound)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(artifact, were made)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be made sound)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(organ, make up system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(artifact, be made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brass instrument, make sound)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(artifact, were made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be made)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be made sound)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)