insulation: get into water pipes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings exhaust pipe
Weight: 0.58
, steel wool
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, drywall
Weight: 0.33
, flooring
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get into water pipes 1.00
get into hot water pipes 0.97
drip water 0.76
come out of vents 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(exhaust pipe, drip water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(exhaust pipe, drip water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(exhaust pipe, drip water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(insulation, get into water pipes)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(insulation, get into hot water pipes)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(insulation, get into hot water pipes)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(insulation, get into hot water pipes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insulation, get into hot water pipes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(insulation, come out of vents)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(insulation, come out of vents)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(insulation, come out of vents)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(insulation, come out of vents)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(insulation, get into water pipes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(insulation, get into water pipes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(insulation, get into water pipes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(exhaust pipe, drip water)