insult: have effect told by loved one

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.63
, joke
Weight: 0.55
, excuse
Weight: 0.55
, reference
Weight: 0.54
, attack
Weight: 0.52
Siblings assault
Weight: 0.30
, laughing
Weight: 0.30
, laughter
Weight: 0.30
, pronoun
Weight: 0.29
, statement
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have effect told by loved one 1.00
told by loved one 0.96
have effect told 0.90
be funny explained 0.77
be natural reaction to something funny 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, be funny explained)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(joke, be funny explained)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(joke, be funny explained)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(laughter, be natural reaction to something funny)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, be funny explained)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(laughter, be natural reaction to something funny)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(laughter, be natural reaction to something funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(insult, have effect told by loved one)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(insult, told by loved one)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(insult, have effect told)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(insult, told by loved one)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(insult, told by loved one)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(insult, told by loved one)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(insult, have effect told)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(insult, have effect told)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(joke, be funny explained)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(laughter, be natural reaction to something funny)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(insult, have effect told by loved one)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(joke, be funny explained)