insurance: be cheaper for females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, operating expense
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, payment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper for females 1.00
be more expensive for males 0.91
is cheaper 0.87
be cheaper with drivers 0.82
is more expensive 0.80
be expensive for teenagers 0.80
be on more expensive 0.80
be cheaper with named drivers 0.80
be higher for people 0.79
be more expensive for young drivers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(insurance, be cheaper for females)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive for teenagers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive for teenagers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive for teenagers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for teenagers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be cheaper for females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females)