integrated circuit: differ from transistors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings circuit breaker
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, module
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from transistors 1.00
be preferred to transistors 0.95
be made of silicon 0.80
need capacitors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, need capacitors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(circuit, differ from transistors)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(circuit, need capacitors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(circuit, differ from transistors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circuit, need capacitors)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diode, be made of silicon)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, need capacitors)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(diode, be made of silicon)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(diode, be made of silicon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circuit, differ from transistors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circuit, need capacitors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(diode, be made of silicon)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(circuit, differ from transistors)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(integrated circuit, differ from transistors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circuit, need capacitors)