integration: be by parts hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be by parts hard 1.00
be by parts 0.92
is hard 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(separation, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(separation, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(separation, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(operating system, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(operating system, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(integration, be by parts hard)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(integration, be by parts)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integration, be by parts)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(integration, be by parts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(integration, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(integration, is hard)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(integration, be by parts hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(separation, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(integration, be by parts hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(operating system, is hard)