intel: be better for gaming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for gaming 1.00
be better than amd for gaming 0.94
patent gaming console feature 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(intel, be better for gaming)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(intel, patent gaming console feature)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(intel, patent gaming console feature)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(intel, patent gaming console feature)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(intel, be better than amd for gaming)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(intel, patent gaming console feature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(intel, be better for gaming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(intel, be better for gaming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intel, be better for gaming)