intel: has state monopoly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microprocessor
Weight: 0.64
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, samsung
Weight: 0.32
, motorola
Weight: 0.31
, john deere
Weight: 0.31
, thomas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state monopoly 1.00
have monopoly 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(intel, has state monopoly)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(intel, have monopoly)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(intel, have monopoly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(intel, have monopoly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(intel, have monopoly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intel, has state monopoly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(intel, has state monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(intel, has state monopoly)