intelligence: be on woman useless

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.62
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, information
Weight: 0.62
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer database
Weight: 0.32
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, knowledge
Weight: 0.32
, navy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on woman useless 1.00
be on woman 0.85
be irrelevant for teenagers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(intelligence, be on woman useless)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be irrelevant for teenagers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(intelligence, be irrelevant for teenagers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be irrelevant for teenagers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intelligence, be irrelevant for teenagers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(intelligence, be on woman)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intelligence, be on woman)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be on woman)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be on woman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be on woman useless)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(intelligence, be on woman useless) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(intelligence, be on woman useless)