intelligence: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.62
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, information
Weight: 0.62
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer database
Weight: 0.32
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, knowledge
Weight: 0.32
, navy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
is hard 0.82
is more important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wisdom, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(wisdom, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(wisdom, is difficult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wisdom, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wisdom, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(intelligence, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(intelligence, is hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(intelligence, is hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intelligence, is hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intelligence, is more important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(intelligence, is more important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(intelligence, is more important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is more important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(intelligence, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wisdom, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wisdom, is hard)