intelligence: vary greatly in humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.62
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, information
Weight: 0.62
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer database
Weight: 0.32
, wisdom
Weight: 0.32
, knowledge
Weight: 0.32
, navy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
vary greatly in humans 1.00
vary much in humans 0.91
vary 0.83
be significantly improved 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(trait, vary)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trait, vary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trait, vary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(trait, vary)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(intelligence, vary much in humans)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(intelligence, vary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(intelligence, vary much in humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(intelligence, vary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be significantly improved)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(intelligence, be significantly improved)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(intelligence, vary much in humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be significantly improved)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(intelligence, vary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, vary much in humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, vary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intelligence, be significantly improved)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trait, vary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(intelligence, vary greatly in humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trait, vary)